Breaking News re iPlayer
Posted: Thu 12 May 2016 1:17 pm
It has just been announced that TV viewers will definitely need a Licence to view iPlayer. As a result of shake up of the BBC.
The most active English Speaking Expat forum for North Cyprus
http://77.68.27.117/
Nothing is decided yet. The changes could well be a great improvement for 'swallows' who visit the TRNC, allowing them full legal access to iPlayer content whilst in Cyprus (or elsewhere within the EU) without the need for VPN's or similar, as part of the value they get for having a UK TV license in the UK. For those resident outside of the UK it may lead to a proper subscription based service for access to BBC iPlayer, which I for one would welcome. However nothing is yet decided and the fundamental problems with a verification process tied to existing License fee remains. How many simultaneous people would be allowed to 'log in' using a given license fee payment for example ? How could the BBC ensure I do not use my mothers license fee payment information to log in to watch iPlayer content ?In order to improve enforcement and allow BBC content to be ‘portable’ for UK licence fee payers (so they could gain access while on holiday in Europe, something which is currently not offered) the government thinks there is a case for iPlayer to require verification – i.e. access should be conditional upon verification of licence fee payment – so that individuals in other countries, and those in the UK not paying the fee, cannot access licence fee funded content for free. The government will discuss verification and other options with the BBC and look at the best way of implementing this, including through regulations if needed. It will be up to the BBC to determine whether this is an appropriate means of charging international viewers.
I wholeheartedly agree people should read for themselves what the white paper itself actually says and what the Secretary of State for culture media and sport has said in parliament, rather than what some here have claimed is being said. The difference is clear to me. That was and is my point.Zurich-Kabel-Tv wrote: let people read it themselves---
The whole of Cyprus is in and part of the EU as far as the EU is concerned. The obligation that the RoC has to enact and enforce EU legislation in Cyprus is suspended in regards to the north of Cyprus as they do not have effective control of what happens there.Zurich-Kabel-Tv wrote: 1.TRNC and MM are NOT IN THE EU/EEA and do no come under ´fortress europa´
You have missed my point entirely. Legislation relating to UK TV license that makes not having one a criminal offence relates to those who are viewing TV within the UK. It does not relate to or cover those who watch TV outside of the UK. Thus the relevance of quoting sections of the Communications Act 2003 and bold and underlining terms 'criminal offence' on a forum relating to those who live in North Cyprus is questionable. When it comes from someone themselves selling a service that provides and regularly advertises access to blatantly pirated movies' of 'low quality' (read filmed in a cinema on a camcorder), then it is not just relevance that should be noted imo.Zurich-Kabel-Tv wrote: 2.it has NEVER EVER
Exactly the kind of hypothetical scenario, presented as 'information' that leads me to suggest people would be better informed reading what has actually been said and decided and not just rely on your partial fictions. As far as I am concerned your are in the business of spreading FUD.Zurich-Kabel-Tv wrote: so .... follow me now ....