BRS AGM at the Colony
Posted: Sat 26 May 2018 7:52 pm
Well, another interesting British Residents Society AGM! It was well organised, well run and in a lovely venue.
My main niggle was the quality of the PowerPoint presentation - in my opinion, the font used in the slides to present the facts and figures was far too small. I was very near the front but had great difficulty in reading the information presented. In addition, the use of colour would have made it more interesting, and when using bullet points, particularly when discussing figures, I think it would better to only slightly 'dim' the previous points so that they are still legible, in order that comparisons can be made with current point being discussed. BUT, these are minor quibbles and as I said, the AGM was run extremely efficiently by the Chairman and his (very small) team.
All went smoothly and according to plan until Resolution 3 was presented; I wont go into detail as the Agenda is, or will be on the Website. This appeared to be a well planned intervention to force a change of rules on the newly elected committee. It was not dissimilar, although smaller in scale, to the infamous AGM a few years ago when a similar intervention by some of the same players was successful in causing the then committee to resign en mass. On this occasion too, there was some unnecessary shouting from the floor and people talking over others to get their point across, but the Chairman remained calm and, with the assistance of a couple of erudite (and quite vocal) members of the audience, managed to keep things under control. When it was his turn to speak, the Chairman presented a point by point demolition of Resolution 3 with a carefully planned and well argued response that eventually delivered a significant majority to defeat the Resolution when the vote was taken - Well Done Mr Chairman.
This brings me to my second niggle - at meetings like this where feelings can run high and there is the potential for discord, there must be a Roving Microphone for members 'on the floor'. This achieves two things - it ensures that everyone can hear the question being asked, but perhaps more importantly, it largely ensures that only the person holding the mic can speak.
A very successful AGM, in my opinion. Well done to the Chairman and his small team.
My main niggle was the quality of the PowerPoint presentation - in my opinion, the font used in the slides to present the facts and figures was far too small. I was very near the front but had great difficulty in reading the information presented. In addition, the use of colour would have made it more interesting, and when using bullet points, particularly when discussing figures, I think it would better to only slightly 'dim' the previous points so that they are still legible, in order that comparisons can be made with current point being discussed. BUT, these are minor quibbles and as I said, the AGM was run extremely efficiently by the Chairman and his (very small) team.
All went smoothly and according to plan until Resolution 3 was presented; I wont go into detail as the Agenda is, or will be on the Website. This appeared to be a well planned intervention to force a change of rules on the newly elected committee. It was not dissimilar, although smaller in scale, to the infamous AGM a few years ago when a similar intervention by some of the same players was successful in causing the then committee to resign en mass. On this occasion too, there was some unnecessary shouting from the floor and people talking over others to get their point across, but the Chairman remained calm and, with the assistance of a couple of erudite (and quite vocal) members of the audience, managed to keep things under control. When it was his turn to speak, the Chairman presented a point by point demolition of Resolution 3 with a carefully planned and well argued response that eventually delivered a significant majority to defeat the Resolution when the vote was taken - Well Done Mr Chairman.
This brings me to my second niggle - at meetings like this where feelings can run high and there is the potential for discord, there must be a Roving Microphone for members 'on the floor'. This achieves two things - it ensures that everyone can hear the question being asked, but perhaps more importantly, it largely ensures that only the person holding the mic can speak.
A very successful AGM, in my opinion. Well done to the Chairman and his small team.