Unpaid site fees
Posted: Mon 18 Jun 2018 7:19 pm
Several owners on our site are not paying site fees, is there any legal way we can put pressure on them to get payment?
The most active English Speaking Expat forum for North Cyprus
http://77.68.27.117/
Consult an Avukat with a view to taking them to Court - assuming that the Site in question has a 100% legal Committee and Constitution (see FLOOR OWNERSHIP AND FLOOR EASEMENT LAW July 2010 - this link is probably a little out of date by now) - If you are not familiar with the requirements, then you should probably take a look at the legislation outlined in the Official Gazette, and/or find an Avukat who is familiar with it...ardstrawray wrote:Several owners on our site are not paying site fees, is there any legal way we can put pressure on them to get payment?
We are talking about a debt here - someone owing money to someone else.Cally wrote:Just a thought, are management company able to turn off water/electric as a bargaining tool
The provision of potable water and sanitation is a UNHR requirement, ergo any management company depriving citizens of such basic needs would be in serious legal poo, as a certain east of Girne Belidiye Baskan was reminded so by the TRNC Ombudsmen earlier this year.Cally wrote:Just a thought, are management company able to turn off water/electric as a bargaining tool
What would the legal position be if non-maintenance owners ordered their own water tanker supply direct to their individual house tanks and the maintenance company prevented their supply?Geoff1131 wrote:I dont think that electric could be cut off as Kibtek would need to do that. But water. If the site has a water depot that the other owners pay to top up and also pay for the running of the pumps to deliver the water. Then i would say there is a good case to cut the water supply. Why should paying owners subsidise non payers? If the water is from the municipality then the same as the Kibtek situation!!!
Why?Confused wrote:Posted on wrong thread
tomsteel wrote:What would the legal position be if non-maintenance owners ordered their own water tanker supply direct to their individual house tanks and the maintenance company prevented their supply?Geoff1131 wrote:I dont think that electric could be cut off as Kibtek would need to do that. But water. If the site has a water depot that the other owners pay to top up and also pay for the running of the pumps to deliver the water. Then i would say there is a good case to cut the water supply. Why should paying owners subsidise non payers? If the water is from the municipality then the same as the Kibtek situation!!!