Page 1 of 1
AC 12 Interview Boris
Posted: Tue 18 Jan 2022 6:30 pm
by wanderer
Re: AC 12 Interview Boris
Posted: Wed 19 Jan 2022 9:22 am
by MnM
Re: AC 12 Interview Boris
Posted: Wed 19 Jan 2022 2:09 pm
by Mowgli597
Absolutely brilliant.
Re: AC 12 Interview Boris
Posted: Wed 19 Jan 2022 8:19 pm
by kayess
BBC Witch hunt. been going on since Brexit. Labour were investigated less for falsely taking us to war in Iraq. Trying to save their right to the licence fees.
Re: AC 12 Interview Boris
Posted: Wed 19 Jan 2022 9:00 pm
by jofra
kayess wrote: ↑Wed 19 Jan 2022 8:19 pm
BBC Witch hunt......
You believe this was a work event - sorry, correction - you believe this was a BBC creation.....?

Re: AC 12 Interview Boris
Posted: Wed 19 Jan 2022 11:20 pm
by EnjoyingTheSun
kayess wrote: ↑Wed 19 Jan 2022 8:19 pm
BBC Witch hunt. been going on since Brexit. Labour were investigated less for falsely taking us to war in Iraq. Trying to save their right to the licence fees.
What is interesting is the ones saying the BBC is impartial are all on the left.
Re: AC 12 Interview Boris
Posted: Thu 20 Jan 2022 5:33 am
by Mowgli597
EnjoyingTheSun wrote: ↑Wed 19 Jan 2022 11:20 pm
kayess wrote: ↑Wed 19 Jan 2022 8:19 pm
BBC Witch hunt. been going on since Brexit. Labour were investigated less for falsely taking us to war in Iraq. Trying to save their right to the licence fees.
What is interesting is the ones saying the BBC is impartial are all on the left.
All?
That’s a sweeping statement

Re: AC 12 Interview Boris
Posted: Thu 20 Jan 2022 12:44 pm
by EnjoyingTheSun
Anyone who doesn’t realise that most politicians are hypocrites who vote in rules for us to follow rather than them must have been living in a drawer for the last 50 years. When they banned smoking in offices, pubs etc they made sure that Parliament still had smoking areas.
Re: AC 12 Interview Boris
Posted: Thu 20 Jan 2022 12:50 pm
by EnjoyingTheSun
Mowgli597 wrote: ↑Thu 20 Jan 2022 5:33 am
That’s a sweeping statement
It’s amusing to see Gary Lineker in tears that the gravy train might be over. Gary earns fortunes for presenting a show which is audience proof. If a goldfish presented it, the viewing figures would stay exactly the same. When Jimmy Hill presented Match of The Day it pulled in 12 million viewers and I’ve yet to meet anyone who didn’t loath Jimmy Hill.
Re: AC 12 Interview Boris
Posted: Thu 20 Jan 2022 1:16 pm
by Mowgli597
Sorry mate. You lost me there.
But it doesn’t matter!
Re: AC 12 Interview Boris
Posted: Thu 20 Jan 2022 1:27 pm
by Brazen
A labour MP has been receiving money from a Chinese spy, but this is hardly mentioned by the BBC and most of the media. I actually think that Boris should resign or be booted out; he’s lost the plot and been shown up to be as useful as a chocolate teapot, but the Bbc, by avoiding detailed examination of the Chinese spy scandal and giving more weight to drinks parties has shown that it is not neutral in any shape or form. We all can see that they are out to get Boris but not the labour MP who was trousering cash from China.
Re: AC 12 Interview Boris
Posted: Thu 20 Jan 2022 1:54 pm
by wanderer
Oh poor Beijing Barry it has been covered on the BBC and media generally Call me Dave (PM)and the Boy George(Chancellor) also were pictured with her .Her son worked as an assistant in Beijing Barry's office for a year
The AC12 video was produced by an anti Brexit group but Jed Mercurio re tweeted it when he saw it as he found it hilarious
Re: AC 12 Interview Boris
Posted: Thu 20 Jan 2022 2:01 pm
by EnjoyingTheSun
Brazen wrote: ↑Thu 20 Jan 2022 1:27 pm
I actually think that Boris should resign or be booted out; he’s lost the plot and been shown up to be as useful as a chocolate teapot
No problem with him going but not for this.
Come the 2019 the public had a choice between Johnson & Corbyn. They picked the least worst in the same way as they did with Trump and Hilary Clinton.
I don’t think Johnson was ever in favour of a lockdown but was bounced into it by the usual exaggerated modelling.
Now it seems that if Clinton stood for the Democratic nomination she would defeat Biden who the public have surprisingly discovered is useless. He’s had 50 years as a professional politician achieving zero so surprise surprise he’s achieved zero as president.