Hedge-fund wrote:................ - to be fair the EU won't last the next 3 years anyway!
The original statement by Hedge-fund
waz-24-7 wrote: I will happily put a bet on your 3 year prediction for the demise of the EU. I see it lasting out into the future, reformed, secure and stronger.
Waz's response
Hedge-fund wrote: Shall we say a £1000 bet that the EU will not exist in its present form exactly 3 years from today?
Hedge-fund's taking up of the challenge -
note the subtle change in terms from "the EU won't last the next 3 years"
to "the EU will not exist [b
]in its present form[/b] exactly 3 years from today" (my emphasis)
waz-24-7 wrote:
In 3 years The EU will have disbanded and not exist OR the EU will remain in existence.
Waz's restated understanding of the challenge. It seems to me that:
The EU will have disbanded and not exist is what
Hedge-fund said in his
FIRST statement, i.e.
the EU won't last the next 3 years as picked up by Waz
and
the EU will remain in existence is what
Waz said in his statement, i.e.
..... the EU. I see it lasting out into the future, reformed, secure and stronger albeit reformed etc.
turtle wrote:Bit of back peddling me thinks ?
I think you're right, Turtle - on Hedge-fund's part.
I'd say that Waz's interpretation:
In 3 years The EU will have disbanded and not exist OR the EU will remain in existence.
is the correct one based on the exchanges above.
Otherwise they're both saying the same thing
"The EU will exist in three years time, but not in its present form"!
Typical pub argument/bet